The Cannabis Candy Child Safety Act, AB 1207, authored by Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin (D-Thousand Oaks), passed the Assembly with a 61-0 vote on May 25. The authors claim the bill aims to tackle the “recent surge” in pediatric poisonings and hospitalizations caused by the consumption of cannabis products. AB 1207—focused on the packaging and advertising of cannabis products—was introduced on the Senate floor for the first time on May 26—a day after it cleared the Assembly.
While some may argue that this bill is necessary to protect children, many believe such measures are unnecessary and even overly restrictive. After all, various items, from cleaning products to medications, can be packaged in a way that appeals to children and often has more incidents of child ingestion. Furthermore, the bill could be seen as an unnecessary additional burden on existing cannabis businesses which may need to modify their packaging, logos, or even entire brand identities—all of which would add another layer of unexpected costs for an industry already teetering on the edge.
Impact on Existing Cannabis Brands
If enacted, the Cannabis Candy Child Safety Act would profoundly impact existing cannabis businesses in California. Companies that use packaging and advertising tactics for marketing their products, such as using cartoon characters or alter egos, would need to completely rebrand any products that fail to meet AB 1207 guidelines. This could mean modifications such as revamping logos, replacing identifying characters, changing packaging colors, etc.
Moreover, if they fail to meet the new requirements, it could necessitate companies overhauling entire product lines and brand identities. All these modifications would add another layer of unexpected costs for an industry already teetering on edge due to taxes and regulations imposed by other state laws. On top of all that, companies would also face the risk of being fined for non-compliance if they do not make these modifications in a timely manner.
It is important to consider these potential consequences when debating the merits of AB 1207 and its impact on existing cannabis businesses. While it is true that child safety should be paramount, there must be an understanding of the other costs associated with this bill—and consideration must be given as to whether or not such measures are necessary.
Comparison of Other More Dangerous Items Marketed and Packaged The Same Way
While proponents of California AB 1207 may argue that it is necessary to protect children from the dangers of cannabis products, it is important to note that many other items could pose a risk to kids and remain on store shelves. For instance, most cleaning products come in brightly colored containers and have warnings about potential hazards—but they often use fun characters or cartoon designs for marketing their products and appeal to children.
In addition, household medications such as ibuprofen are packaged in ways designed to attract kids— yet these child-friendly appearances do nothing to prevent accidental ingestions or poisonings. More than 60,000 children are estimated to end up in the emergency room due to accidental poisoning each year—nearly four times the number of reported cases involving cannabis products.
When considering California AB 1207 and its implications, it is important to recognize the potential dangers posed by items other than cannabis products. To protect our children, there must be a comprehensive solution that looks at all potential hazards in our society—not just one plant-based substance.
It is important to consider both sides of the debate surrounding California AB 1207 and the Cannabis Candy Child Safety Act before implementing such measures. While it may be necessary to ensure child safety when dealing with cannabis products, other items on store shelves could potentially cause harm to children—and yet remain largely unregulated.
It is also essential to acknowledge the potential impact this bill could have on existing cannabis businesses which would need costly modifications to their packaging and advertising tactics to comply with AB 1207. Ultimately, we must look at all aspects of this issue—from protecting our children to providing a level playing field for businesses—before implementing such legislation. This will ensure that any child-proofing of the cannabis industry is done fairly and comprehensively.
Using careful consideration of all points discussed, California AB 1207 can protect children from potential harm while ensuring businesses don’t suffer undue burdens due to new regulations. With proper monitoring, this bill can effectively achieve its goal without leading to an overreaching of regulations or punishing businesses already struggling in the industry.
Enjoyed that first hit? Come chill with us every week at the Friday Sesh for a freshly packed bowl of the week’s best cannabis news!
